Table of Contents Nyt Sunday Book Review Sept 9 2018
The New York Times Best Seller listing is widely considered the preeminent list of acknowledged books in the United States.[ane] [2] It has been published weekly in The New York Times Book Review [1] since October 12, 1931.[ane] In the 21st century, it has evolved into multiple lists, grouped by genre and format, including fiction and non-fiction, hardcover, paperback and electronic.
The list is based on a proprietary method that uses sales figures, other data and internal guidelines that are unpublished—how the Times compiles the listing is a merchandise secret.[3] In 1983 (equally part of a legal argument), the Times stated that the list is not mathematically objective merely rather editorial content. In 2017, a Times representative said that the goal is that the lists reverberate authentic best sellers.[4] The list has been a source of controversy. On occasions where the Times believes a volume has reached the list in a suspicious style such as through majority purchases, the book's entry on the list is marked with a dagger symbol (†).[v]
History
External image | |
---|---|
New York Times Best-seller List |
Although the get-go best seller list in America was published in 1895, in The Bookman, a best seller listing was not published in The New York Times until October 12, 1931, 36 years after, with footling fanfare.[vi] [seven] Information technology listed five fiction and four non-fiction books for New York Urban center but.[seven] The next month, the list was expanded to eight cities, each with its own list.[7] By the early on 1940s, 14 city-lists were included. A national list was created on April 9, 1942, in the Sunday New York Times Book Review as a supplement to the Monday edition regular city lists.[7] The national list was ranked according to how many times the book appeared in the city lists.[vii] Somewhen the metropolis lists were eliminated entirely, leaving simply the national ranking list, which was compiled according to "reports from leading booksellers in 22 cities".[7] Ranking past bookseller sales figures continues today, although the procedure has remained proprietary.[three]
By the 1950s, The Times 's listing had become the leading best-seller listing for book professionals to monitor, along with that of Publishers Weekly.[7] In the 1960s and 1970s, shopping-mall concatenation bookstores B. Dalton, Crown Books, and Waldenbooks came to the forefront with a concern model of selling newly published best-sellers with mass-marketplace appeal. They used the best-selling condition of titles to marketplace the books and not just as a measure of sales, thus placing increased emphasis on the New York Times listing for volume readers and book sellers.[7]
As shown in the graph below, the number of titles achieving the number 1 spot has grown consistently over the years, ranging from fewer than 10 in the 1970s to the high thirties in the by decade. This graph represents fiction titles merely. Years with smaller numbers means ane or more than titles dominated as major best sellers, notably The Da Vinci Code in 2003 and 2004, Fifty Shades of Grey in 2012 and Where the Crawdads Sing in 2019.[eight]
NYT Number 1 Fiction Titles per Yr (1970–2020) |
Composition
The list is compiled by the editors of the "News Surveys" section, not by The New York Times Book Review department, where information technology is published.[ix] Information technology is based on weekly sales reports obtained from selected samples of independent and chain bookstores and wholesalers throughout the United States.[9] The sales figures are widely believed to correspond books that have really been sold at retail, rather than wholesale,[10] equally the Times surveys booksellers in an attempt to better reflect what is purchased by individual buyers. Some books are flagged with a dagger indicating that a significant number of majority orders had been received by retail bookstores.[11]
The New York Times reported in 2013 that "we [mostly practise not] track the sales of classic literature," and thus, for instance, new translations of Dante'south Inferno would not be found on the bestseller listing.[12]
The verbal method for compiling the data obtained from the booksellers is classified every bit a trade secret.[3] Book Review staff editor Gregory Cowles explained the method "is a hush-hush both to protect our product and to make certain people can't try to rig the system. Even in the Book Review itself, we don't know (the news surveys department's) precise methods."[nine] In 1992, the survey encompassed over 3,000 bookstores besides every bit "representative wholesalers with more than 28,000 other retail outlets, including variety stores and supermarkets."[3] By 2004, the number was 4,000 bookstores besides as an unstated number of wholesalers.[7] Data is adjusted to give more than weight to independent book stores, which are underrepresented in the sample.[vii]
The lists are divided among fiction and non-fiction, print and e-volume, paperback and hardcover; each list contains 15 to 20 titles. The lists have been subdivided several times. "Advice, How-To, and Miscellaneous" debuted every bit a list of 5 on Jan 1, 1984. It was created because advice all-time-sellers were sometimes crowding the general not-fiction list.[13] Its inaugural number i bestseller, The Body Principal past Victoria Principal, had been number 10 and number 12 on the not-fiction lists for the two preceding weeks.[14] [15] In July 2000, the "Children's Best Sellers" was created after the Harry Potter series had stayed in the peak spots on the fiction list for an extended menses of time.[16] [17] The children'southward list was printed monthly until February xiii, 2011, when it was inverse to once an issue (weekly). In September 2007, the paperback fiction list was divided into "trade" and "mass-marketplace" sections, in order to give more visibility to the trade paperbacks that were more than often reviewed by the paper itself.[eighteen] In November 2010, The New York Times announced it would be tracking eastward-book best-seller lists in fiction and nonfiction starting in early 2011.[nineteen] "RoyaltyShare, a San Diego-based company that tracks data and aggregates sales data for publishers, will ... provide [e-book] data".[19] The two new e-book lists were starting time published with the February 13, 2011, outcome, the first tracks combined print and e-volume sales, the 2nd tracks e-volume sales just (both lists are further sub-divided into Fiction and Non-fiction). In addition a third new list was published on the web only, which tracks combined print sales (hardcover and paperback) in fiction and nonfiction. In December xvi, 2012, the children'due south affiliate books listing was divided into two new lists: heart-course (ages viii–12) and young adult (historic period 12–18), both which include sales across all platforms (hard, newspaper and e-volume).
Statistics
According to an EPJ Data Science written report that used big data to analyze every New York Times bestselling book from 2008–2016, of the 100,000 new, hardcover impress books published each year, fewer than 500 arrive on to The New York Times Best Seller listing (0.5 per centum). Most novels (26 percent) appear on the list for only ane week. To make the listing, it is estimated that novels sell from one,000 to ten,000 copies per week, depending on competition. Median sales fluctuate between four,000 and viii,000 in fiction, and two,000–6,000 in nonfiction. The bulk of New York Times bestselling books sell from 10,000 to 100,000 copies in their starting time yr.[twenty] [21]
During the menstruum studied (6 August 2008 to 10 March 2016), Dan Brown's book The Lost Symbol held the tape with 3 million copies sold in one year followed by The Girl Who Kicked the Hornets' Nest by Stieg Larsson and Go Ready a Watchman by Harper Lee which sold 1.vi meg copies each. In nonfiction, more than than half of the hardcover books that brand the listing are in the biography category. The autobiography of George West. Bush-league, Decision Points, sold the most copies in one year followed by the biography Steve Jobs by Walter Isaacson.[20]
Criticisms
The list has been criticized by authors, publishers, volume industry executives, and others for not providing an authentic accounting of true all-time-seller condition.[vii] These criticisms have been ongoing e'er since the list originated.[7] A book industry written report in the 1940s found that best-seller lists were a poor indicator of sales, since they were based on misleading data and were only measuring fast sales (see "fast sale" criticism below).[7] A 2004 report quoted a senior volume marketing executive who said the rankings were "smoke and mirrors"; while a report in Book History plant that many professionals in the book manufacture "scoffed at the notion that the lists are accurate".[7]
Specific criticisms include:
- Fast sales.[seven] [22] A book that never makes the list can really outsell books on the best-seller list. This is because the best-seller listing reflects sales in a given calendar week, not full sales. Thus, ane book may sell heavily in a given week, making the listing, while another may sell at a slower pace, never making the list, but selling more copies over time.
- Double counting. Past including wholesalers in the polls along with retail bookstores, books may exist double-counted.[7] Wholesalers study how much they sell to retailers, and retailers written report how much they sell to customers, thus there can be overlap with the same reported book being sold twice inside a given time frame. In addition, retailers may return books to wholesalers months later if they never sell, thus resulting in a "sale" being reported that never came to fruition. For instance, mass-market paperbacks tin see as loftier equally 40% return rates from the retailer back to the wholesaler.[seven]
- Manipulation by authors and publishers. In 1956, author Jean Shepherd created the fake novel I, Libertine to illustrate how easy information technology was to dispense the best-seller lists based on demand, likewise as sales. Fans of Shepherd'due south radio show planted references to the book and author so widely that demand for the book led to claims of it being on the Times list.[23] [24] Author Jacqueline Susann (Valley of the Dolls) attempted to "butter-upward" Times-reporting booksellers and personally bought large quantities of her own book.[7] Author Wayne Dyer (Your Erroneous Zones) purchased thousands of copies of his own book.[7] Al Neuharth (Confessions of an Due south. O. B.), former head of Gannett Company, had his Gannett Foundation buy 2 m copies of his own autobiography.[vii] In 1995, authors Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema spent $200,000 to buy ten k copies of The Discipline of Marketplace Leaders from dozens of bookstores.[7] Although they denied any wrongdoing, the book spent 15 weeks on the list. As a event of this scandal the Times began placing a dagger symbol side by side to any title for which bookstores reported bulk orders.[7] However, daggers do non e'er appear; for example Tony Hsieh's Delivering Happiness was known to have been manipulated with majority orders merely didn't take a dagger.[25] Companies that contract with authors to manipulate the bestseller listing through "bestseller campaigns" include ResultSource.[26]
- Manipulation by retailers and wholesalers.[7] Information technology happens with regularity that wholesalers and retailers deliberately or inadvertently manipulate the sales data they written report to the Times.[7] Since being on the Times best-seller list increases the sales of a book, bookstores and wholesalers may report a book is a all-time-seller before it really is one, in social club that it might later get a "legitimate" best-seller through increased sales due to its inclusion on the all-time-seller listing,[vii] leading to the all-time-seller list condign a cocky-fulfilling prophecy for the booksellers.
- Leading data collection. The Times provides booksellers with a form containing a list of books it believes might be bestsellers, to cheque off, with an alternative "Other" cavalcade to make full in manually.[7] It's been criticized as a leading technique to create a all-time-seller list based on books the Times thinks might be included.[7] 1 bookseller compared it to a voting menu in which ii options for President are provided: "Bill Clinton and Other".[7]
- Self-fulfilling. Once a volume makes it onto the listing information technology is heavily marketed as a "best-seller", purchased by readers who seek out best-sellers, given preferential treatment by retailers, online and offline, who create special all-time-seller categories including special in-store placement and price discounts, and is carried past retailers that mostly don't conduct other books (due east.g., supermarkets).[7] Thus, the list tin get self-fulfilling in determining which books have high sales and remain on the list.[7]
- Conflicts of interest. Due to high financial impact of making the list, since the 1970s publishers have created escalator clauses for major authors stipulating that if a book makes the listing the writer volition receive actress coin, based on where it ranks and for how long.[vii] Authors may as well be able to charge college speaking fees for the status of being a best-seller.[7] As Book History said, "With so much at stake then, information technology is no wonder that enormous marketing effort goes into getting a volume access to this major marketing tool."[7]
Controversies
In 1983, author William Peter Blatty sued The New York Times for $vi million, challenge that his book, Legion (filmed equally The Exorcist 3), had not been included in the list due to either negligence or intentional falsehood, saying it should take been included due to high sales. The Times countered that the list was not mathematically objective but rather was editorial content and thus protected under the Constitution as free spoken language. Blatty appealed information technology to the Supreme Court, which declined to hear the case. Thus, the lower court ruling stood that the list is editorial content, not objective factual content, so the Times had the right to exclude books from the list.[7]
In 1995, Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema, the authors of a book called The Subject field of Marketplace Leaders, colluded to manipulate their volume onto the best seller charts. The authors allegedly purchased over 10,000 copies of their own book in small and strategically placed orders at bookstores whose sales are reported to BookScan. Because of the benefits of making The New York Times Best Seller list (speaking engagements, more volume deals, and consulting) the authors felt that buying their ain piece of work was an investment that would pay for itself. The volume climbed to No. 4 on the list where information technology sat for xv weeks; it likewise peaked at No. 1 on the BusinessWeek all-time seller list. Since such lists hold the ability of cumulative advantage, nautical chart success often begets more nautical chart success. Although such efforts are not illegal, publishers consider them unethical.[27]
In 1999, Amazon.com announced a 50% subtract in price for books on the All-time Seller List to beat out its contest, Barnes & Noble.[28] Afterwards a legal dispute between Amazon and The New York Times, Amazon was permitted to go on using the listing on status that it displayed it in alphabetical rather than numerical order.[29] By 2010, this was no longer the case; Amazon now displays the best-seller list in order of best-selling titles first.[30]
In 2013, Forbes published a story titled "Here's How You Buy Your Way Onto The New York Times Bestsellers List."[31] The article discusses how ResultSource, a San Diego-based marketing consultancy, specializes in ensuring books brand a bestseller list, even guaranteeing a No. 1 spot for those willing to pay enough. The New York Times was informed of this practice and responded: "The New York Times comprehensively tracks and tabulates the weekly unit of measurement sales of all titles reported by book retailers as their full general involvement bestsellers. Nosotros volition not comment across our methodology on the other questions." The New York Times did not alarm its readers to this, unlike The Wall Street Journal, which admitted that books had landed on its bestseller listing due to ResultSource'south campaign.[32] Soren Kaplan, the source who admitted he had paid ResultSource to land his book, Leapfrogging, on The Wall Street Journal 'south bestseller listing, revealed the methodology on his blog; he posted: "If I could obtain majority orders before Leapfrogging was released, ResultSource would buy the books on my behalf using their tried-and-truthful formula. Three thousand books sold would get me on The Wall Street Journal bestseller list. Xi thousand would secure a spot on the biggest prize of them all, The New York Times list."[33]
In 2014, the Los Angeles Times published a story titled "Tin bestseller lists exist bought?"[34] It describes how writer and pastor Mark Driscoll contracted the company ResultSource to place his book Existent Union (2012) on The New York Times Best Seller listing for a $200,000 fee. The contract was for ResultSource "to conduct a bestseller campaign for your book, Real Marriage on the week of January two, 2012. The bestseller campaign is intended to identify Real Marriage on The New York Times bestseller list for the Advice How-to list." To reach this, the contract stated that "RSI will be purchasing at to the lowest degree 11,000 full orders in i week." This took place, and the book successfully reached No.1 on the hardcover advice bestseller listing on January 22, 2014.[34]
In July 2015, Ted Cruz'southward book A Time For Truth was excluded from the list considering the "overwhelming preponderance of testify was that sales [of Cruz'southward book] were limited to strategic majority purchases" to artificially increase sales and entry onto the list. In response, Cruz called the Times "a liar" and demanded an amends.[35] The Times said it stood by its statement and evidence of manipulation.
In August 2017, a young developed fiction book, Handbook for Mortals by previously unpublished author Lani Sarem was removed from the listing, where it was in initially in the No. ane spot. According to a statement issued by the Times, "after investigating the inconsistencies in the most recent reporting bicycle, nosotros decided that the sales for Handbook for Mortals did not run across our criteria for inclusion. We've issued an updated 'Immature Adult Hardcover' listing for September 3, 2017 which does not include that title."[36] It was uncovered, past author Phil Stamper, that there had been unusual bulk ordering patterns which inflated the number of sales.[37] The volume is published by GeekNation, an entertainment website based in Los Angeles.[36] The book was originally written every bit a script, and was rewritten as a novel in an attempt to launch a film franchise.[38] [39]
In Baronial 2017, conservative publisher Regnery Publishing said information technology would no longer allow its writers to claim "New York Times all-time-selling authors" due to its belief the Times favors liberal books on the list. The Times responded the political views of authors have no begetting on the list and noted conservative authors routinely rank highly on the list. The Associated Press noted the Times is a frequent target of conservatives and Republicans.[40] The Washington Post called Regenery's ban a "stunt" designed to increase sales, "What better manner to sell a volume to a conservative audience than to promote the idea that the New York Times doesn't similar it?" The Mail compared the list to best seller lists from Publishers Weekly looking for bias but could not discover anything disarming.[41]
In February 2018, the Toronto Star published a story by books editor Deborah Dundas who found that the acknowledged book 12 Rules for Life by Jordan Peterson, who topped Publishers Weekly chart listing, did non even nautical chart on The New York Times bestsellers list, without reliable answers from the New York Times. The Times stated it was not counted because it was published past a Canadian company.[42] According to Random House Canada, the book was handled properly for the U.South. marketplace.[43] [44] American conservative commentator Dennis Prager wrote an commodity for National Review titled "The Times Best-Seller Listing: Another Reason Americans Don't Trust the Media" in which he contends that the issue with Peterson'southward book, besides his The Rational Bible: Exodus, is their conservative context and the lack of inclusion is the American mainstream media'south manipulation.[45] The Times denied any bias.[46]
In 2019, the release of Donald Trump, Jr.'s book Triggered was shown to have merely reached the all-time-seller list through approximately $100,000 in backside-the-scenes bulk purchases meant to pump upwards its sales numbers illegitimately.[47] Vanity Fair reported in October 2020 that this sort of gaming of the system has been a common practise among American conservative political figures, and has also included the apply of political entrada funds to purchase the books in bulk in order to boost their rank on the list.[48]
Studies
A Stanford Business School assay suggests that the "bulk of book buyers seem to utilize the Times ' listing as a signal of what's worth reading".[49] The study concluded that lesser-known writers become the biggest benefit from being on the listing, while perennial best-selling authors, such as John Grisham or Danielle Steel, see no do good of additional sales.[49]
See besides
- Lists of The New York Times Fiction Best Sellers
- Lists of The New York Times Not-Fiction Best Sellers
- Lists of The New York Times Manga Best Sellers
- Oprah's Volume Club
- Publishers Weekly lists of bestselling novels in the United States
References
- ^ a b c John Carry, The #1 New York Times All-time Seller: intriguing facts most the 484 books that have been #1 New York Times bestsellers since the first list, fifty years agone, Berkeley: X Speed Press, 1992.
- ^ Republican Representative Billy Tauzin of Louisiana, while Chairman of the Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Trade, and Consumer Protection, said "the New York Times all-time-seller listing is widely considered to be one of the near administrative lists of which books are selling the nigh in American bookstores" during his Opening Statement for Hearing on H.R. 1858 Archived May ii, 2017, at the Wayback Car on June 15, 1999.
- ^ a b c d Diamond, Edwin (1995). Behind the Times: Inside the New New York Times . University of Chicago Press. p. 364. ISBN9780679418771.
- ^ Bauder, David (September 4, 2017). "Conservative publisher wants zip more to do with Times". Associated Printing. Archived from the original on February 23, 2019.
- ^ Bartnett, Erin (May 25, 2018). "Are Conservative Titles Using Shady Tricks to Get Onto the Bestseller List?". Electric Literature . Retrieved December 12, 2020.
- ^ The New York Times, October 12, 1931. nineteen
- ^ a b c d e f one thousand h i j 1000 50 m due north o p q r s t u five w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah Laura J. Miller (2000). "The All-time-Seller List equally Marketing Tool and Historical Fiction". In Ezra Greenspan (ed.). Volume History. Vol. three. Penn Land Press. pp. 286–304. ISBN0271020504.
- ^ Hawes Publications, New York Times Adult Hardcover All-time Seller Number Ones Listing Fiction Past Date
- ^ a b c Pierleoni, Allen (January 22, 2012). "Best-sellers lists: How they work and who they (mostly) work for". The Sacramento Bee. Archived from the original on January 25, 2012.
- ^ "Blatty Sue Times on Best-Seller List", from The New York Times, Baronial 29, 1983.
- ^ "Most the Best Sellers". The New York Times.
- ^ Cowles, Gregory (June 2, 2013). "Inside the List". The New York Times Book Review . Retrieved June 5, 2013.
- ^ "TBR: Inside the list". The New York Times. February 24, 2008. p. BR26.
- ^ "The New York Times Book Review Best Sellers". The New York Times. Jan i, 1984. p. BR28.
- ^ "Best Sellers". The New York Times. December 25, 1983. p. BR13.
- ^ "Bestseller Math". riverdeep.net. November 12, 2001. Archived from the original on May xviii, 2013. Retrieved July 23, 2007.
- ^ "The Times Plans a Children's Best-Seller List". newyorktimes.com. November 12, 2001. Archived from the original on November 5, 2019. Retrieved September ix, 2020.
- ^ "Upwardly Front". The New York Times Book Review. September 23, 2007. p. 4.
it gives more accent on the literary novels and short-story collections reviewed so often in our pages
- ^ a b Bosman, Julie (November x, 2010). "Times Will Rank E-Volume Best Sellers". The New York Times.
- ^ a b Yucesoy, Burcu; Wang, Xindi; Huang, Junming; Barabási, Albert-László (Dec 2018). "Success in books: a big data arroyo to bestsellers". EPJ Data Science. 7 (one): 1–25. doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-018-0135-y. ISSN 2193-1127.
- ^ Griffin, Elle (January 17, 2021). "No One Volition Read Your Book". Medium . Retrieved January 25, 2021.
- ^ J. E. Fishman, 12 Common Misperceptions Nearly Book Publishing, The Nervous Breakup, December 1, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2011.
- ^ Lortie, Arthur (Dec 17, 2012). "All I desire for Christmas is my proper noun on the Bestseller's List". The Herald News. Archived from the original on November v, 2013. Retrieved July 8, 2013.
- ^ Wilcock, John (August 1, 1956). "The Book That Wasn't". The Village Voice. Archived from the original on Baronial 8, 2007. Retrieved November 9, 2007.
- ^ Jeff Bercovici (February 22, 2013). "Hither's How Yous Buy Your Way Onto The New York Times Bestsellers Listing". Forbes . Retrieved March 17, 2014.
- ^ Jeffrey A. Trachtenberg (February 22, 2013). "The Mystery of the Volume Sales Spike". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on March 5, 2014. Retrieved March 17, 2014.
- ^ Stern, Willy (August 1995). "Did Dirty Tricks Create a Best-Seller?". Bloomberg. Retrieved March 18, 2019.
- ^ Who owns the New York Times bestseller list? , by Scott Rosenberg, Salon.com, June 23, 1999
- ^ "Amazon.com and The New York Times Settle Legal Dispute Over Utilize of Times Best Sellers List", Business concern Wire, August 9, 1999.
- ^ New York Times Bestseller list at Amazon.com.
- ^ Jeff Bercovici (February 22, 2013). "Hither's How You Buy Your Way Onto The New York Times Bestsellers List". Forbes . Retrieved March nineteen, 2014.
- ^ Jeffrey A. Trachtenberg (February 22, 2013). "The Mystery of the Book Sales Fasten". The Wall Street Periodical. Archived from the original on March 5, 2014. Retrieved March xix, 2014.
- ^ Soren Kaplan (February 2013). "Debunking the Bestseller". Weblog . Retrieved March xix, 2014.
- ^ a b Carolyn Kellogg (March 6, 2014). "Can bestseller lists be bought?". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved March seven, 2014.
- ^ Dylan Byers (July ten, 2015). "Cruz campaign: New York Times is lying about bulk volume sales". Pol . Retrieved September 3, 2015.
- ^ a b Italie, Hillel (August 26, 2017). "Book Pulled From Best-Seller List". Time. Associated Printing. Archived from the original on September fourteen, 2017. Retrieved September eleven, 2017.
- ^ Jessica Roy (August 24, 2017). "Did a YA volume buy its manner to the elevation of the New York Times bestseller listing?". LA Times . Retrieved Baronial 25, 2017.
- ^ Ha, Thu-Huong (August 30, 2017). "A showtime-time writer unwittingly exposed the house of cards beneath 'bestseller' books". Quartz . Retrieved September eleven, 2017.
- ^ Chris Gardner (July 28, 2017). "GeekNation Launches Book Publishing Arm, Partners with Lani Sarem on YA Series 'Handbook for Mortals'". The Hollywood Reporter . Retrieved August 25, 2017.
- ^ "The Latest: New York Times Denies List Favors Liberal Books". The New York Times. Associated Press. September 4, 2017. Archived from the original on September 12, 2017.
- ^ Callum Borchers and Kevin Uhrmacher (September half-dozen, 2017). "Why a conservative book publisher's protest of the New York Times bestsellers list is just a stunt". The Washington Mail service . Retrieved September 12, 2017.
- ^ Dundas, Deborah (February 9, 2018). "Jordan Peterson's book is a bestseller – except where it matters near". Toronto Star. Archived from the original on March iii, 2018. Retrieved March 3, 2018.
- ^ Hopper, Tristin (March vii, 2018). "Could Jordan Peterson get the acknowledged Canadian author of all time?". Edmonton Periodical . Retrieved March 12, 2018.
- ^ Stelter, Brian (Apr xvi, 2018). "Every top New York Times best-seller this twelvemonth has been about Trump". CNN . Retrieved April 17, 2018.
- ^ Prager, Dennis (Apr 17, 2018). "The Times Best-Seller Listing: Another Reason Americans Don't Trust the Media". National Review . Retrieved April 17, 2018.
- ^ Brian Flood (Apr 19, 2018). "New York Times denies bias confronting conservative authors during intense shareholder meeting, advocate says". Fox News. Retrieved October 22, 2018.
- ^ "R.Northward.C. Spent Almost $100,000 on Copies of Donald Trump Jr.'s Book "Triggered", published Nov. 5, topped the best-seller listing thanks in part to a large society from the Republican National Committee". The New York Times . Retrieved December 12, 2020.
- ^ Weiss, Angela. "IS THE GOP GAMING THE NEW YORK TIMES Best-SELLER LISTS?". Vanity Fair. Retrieved December 12, 2020.
- ^ a b "Readers Tap Best-Seller List for New Authors". Stanford Business Magazine. Feb 2005. Archived from the original on September xx, 2006. Retrieved December 23, 2006. Come across also Alan T. Sorensen, Bestseller Lists and Product Multifariousness: The Example of Book Sales, May 2004.
Further reading
- Barabási, Albert-László (November 28, 2018). "What big data tin can tell us about how a book becomes a best-seller". The Conversation . Retrieved July xix, 2019.
- Bolonik, Kera (August 16, 2000). "A list of their own". Salon. [controversy regarding the children's listing]
External links
- The New York Times Best Seller List (current)
- The New York Times Best Seller List (historical)
- Previous fiction #1 best sellers
- Previous non-fiction #1 best sellers
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times_Best_Seller_list
0 Response to "Table of Contents Nyt Sunday Book Review Sept 9 2018"
Post a Comment